Beyond the bottom line is the story of a large, and growing, group of corporate citizens who take their ethical responsibilities seriously-and make a good deal of money by doing so. Far from being a burden on corporations.
How business leaders are turning principles into profits
Principles and Premises
Business ethics contradiction in terms?
" Do other man, for they would do you." That's the true business precept. - Charles Dicknes
Ethics is good business
A Recent Wall Street Journal article asked whether the term " Business Ethics" should be considered, like "jumbo shrimp," an oxymoron.
First, The outcry indicates ironically that morality does matter in business-that, to answer the question posed by the little of this "Business ethics" is not contradiction in terms. Cynics quote the proverb " you've got to have a little thief in you to get ahead," and say that success is impossible in business unless you are willing to lie, cheat, and steal. University of Kansas ethics professor Richard De George call this opinion part of the " Myth of Amoral Business," and he notes succinctly how the public outcry over commercial immortality gives this myth the lie :
If it were true that business is viewed as amoral, that it is not expected to behave according to moral rules, and that it is appropriate for it to do whatever is necessary in order to increase its profit, then there would be no surprise, shock, or uproar when a business acted immorally. The uncovering of bribes and kickbacks would not be news.
The fact that such revelations are news indicates to De George that, in spite of what the Myth suggest, business is expected to be moral. The disruption of standards gives offense only because those standards are generally accepted valid.
Ethical Models
- First, your judgement about an action is not really a judgement at all, but merely an expression of our personal feelings about it. The implication is that nothing external really exists, only your view ( of the nonexistent).
- Second, you are not allowed to disagree with anyone about the morality of an action. if you do disagree, you must admit that you are expressing only a baseless conjecture, unconnected to reality.
- Third, neither you nor anyone else can ever be mistaken in a judgement, since you're making no claim on the facts, only on your "view" of them. Therefore, you can say on thing today, the opposite tomorrow, and be right both times.
- Finally, you are empowered to alter the morality of an action by expressing a different opinion on it. "if a moral judgement is only the report of an emotion or the expressing of an emotion, then by changing his emotion a person changes the morality of the action."
- Be universalizable. That is, it would make sense, consistently, for everybody in a similar situation to take the same action.
- Demonstrate respect for individual human beings. It would treat others not as means, but as ends in themselves.
- Be acceptable to all rational beings. If the action were made the basis of universal law, receivers as well as initiators of the action would agree that it was just.






